It’s Ok For Parliament To Pay OTT For Members Of Parliament
Bungokho North Member of Parliament Gershom Sizomu
Wambede says Ugandans should not bash MPs on issues relating to the payment of
social media tax (OTT) and bundles on Ipads that were given to them by
government.
Sizomu says since they were given Ipads by
government, they are supposed to be provided with data and taxes for the social
media tax should be paid for them.
Sizomu says that if the social media tax was to be
paid for MPs personal phones, it would be a different case and the public would
justifiably be right to attack the MPs.
Meanwhile
as millions of Ugandan internet users grapple to pay the Over The Top (OTT) tax
for social media accessibility, Members of Parliament will receive free
services for their iPads as parliament hires MTN, a telecom service provider to
provide mobile data and OTT tax for them.
The Parliamentary
Commission recently embarked on a bidding process to identify the best service
provider to provide mobile data and OTT tax for mobile computing devices for
MPs.
According to the Best
Evaluated bidder notice released on May 02, 2019, MTN beat Airtel Uganda
Limited and Africel Uganda Limited who were eliminated at the preliminary
stage. The bidding notice indicates that MTN will provide a 5GB monthly bundle
at Shs30,000 and Shs6000 OTT tax for each MPs’ device per month. This means
that Parliament will spend Shs36,000 for each MP per month. With a total of
about 460 MPs, Parliament will part with Shs16,560,000 per month for the MPs’
mobile data and OTT tax payment for their iPads.
In September 2018
during the debate on the Excise Duty Bill (2018), Obongi County MP Kaps
Fungaroo asked Parliament to intervene because they were not accessing social
media platforms on their iPads due to rigidities from the service provider.
Fungaroo’s statement
faced backlash from the public who anticipated that the MPs could be asking for
taxpayers’ to foot their OTT tax bills.
However, Moses
Bwalatum, the Principal Communication officer at Parliament in a statement
released in 2018, refuted the claims saying that the MP was simply seeking for
guidelines on a flexible system to allow MPs to load bundles or pay OTT using
their iPads.
“MPs are provided
iPads by the Parliamentary Commission to facilitate their legislative duties.
In a move to cut costs on expenses incurred on printing bulky reports, statements,
and other communication, all Parliament reports/documents are uploaded onto
their iPads. This is in line with the move to have a paperless Parliament. The
iPads, however, remain the property of Parliament. By the nature of the data
contract signed with Parliament before the advent of the OTT Tax, it is only
the service provider that can load bundles on the MPs iPads,” the statement
says.
“It is in the inability for Members to pay for the OTT Tax on their iPads that the MP rose to
seek guidance from the House. The MP asked Parliament to revisit the terms of
the contract to either allow them to pay for their OTT Tax or the service provider
bears the cost because their restricted access is constraining their work and
interaction with their constituents and the public,” the statement adds.
Bwalatum added that it
is therefore not correct to say that MPs want their OTT Tax paid for by
Parliament because “they are already paying the tax on their personal
communication gadgets.”
The latest development
now clearly shows that Parliament will foot OTT tax bills for all the MPs.
Parliament spent $563,000 (about Shs2bn) for procurement of MPs iPads. MPs are
asked to pay Shs500,000 at the end of their tenure if they want to retain the device as their personal property.
Comments
Post a Comment